|
|
Post by tigers on Mar 19, 2008 7:21:29 GMT -4
We are not going to get five owners to allow a vote that trusts a committee to exclusively plan the party. It's useless because the votes just aren't there.
Let's concentrate on creating a committee that presents worthwhile party plans for league-wide approval. Where is everyone on this?
|
|
|
|
Post by wardogs on Mar 19, 2008 13:05:18 GMT -4
We are not going to get five owners to allow a vote that trusts a committee to exclusively plan the party. It's useless because the votes just aren't there. Let's concentrate on creating a committee that presents worthwhile party plans for league-wide approval. Where is everyone on this? Tigers, this sounds like a great idea....count me in |
|
|
|
Post by yankmes on Mar 19, 2008 13:31:20 GMT -4
guys as iverson would say this is football if you want to go out and hold hands do it on your dimelike i said this is football football football
|
|
|
|
Post by uhlans on Mar 19, 2008 13:43:15 GMT -4
We are not going to get five owners to allow a vote that trusts a committee to exclusively plan the party. It's useless because the votes just aren't there. Let's concentrate on creating a committee that presents worthwhile party plans for league-wide approval. Where is everyone on this? Tigers - its not useless to try ...... Why years after members wanted to put this league on the internet the biggest naysayer(squeaky wheel - now who could that be?  ) finally seen the error in his ways and relented. |
|
|
|
Post by uhlans on Mar 19, 2008 13:49:17 GMT -4
I've seriously underestimated many things and now wonder how anything at all has ever gotten done. There probably isn't the words to express it. I'm just sitting here in shock at the utter sense of futility many of you have surely felt over the many years. Welcome to the rabbit hole |
|
|
|
Post by uhlans on Mar 19, 2008 13:51:38 GMT -4
We are not going to get five owners to allow a vote that trusts a committee to exclusively plan the party. It's useless because the votes just aren't there. Let's concentrate on creating a committee that presents worthwhile party plans for league-wide approval. Where is everyone on this? So we can't find 5 people to agree to trust 3 people? Of the same group !!!!!! I'm far to trusting ...................................  |
|
|
|
Post by wardogs on Mar 19, 2008 14:35:23 GMT -4
We are not going to get five owners to allow a vote that trusts a committee to exclusively plan the party. It's useless because the votes just aren't there. Let's concentrate on creating a committee that presents worthwhile party plans for league-wide approval. Where is everyone on this? Tigers - its not useless to try ...... Why years after members wanted to put this league on the internet the biggest naysayer(squeaky wheel - now who could that be? ) finally seen the error in his ways and relented. AND THE WARDOGS RESPONSE IS I will assume that I am the squeaky wheel.....once again with the misinformation....I have never been against an internet league..never. WHAT I AM AGAINST IS AN INTERNET PERFORMANCE LEAGUE...CAN I ASSUME THIS IS NEXT ON THE AGENDA |
|
|
|
Post by yankmes on Mar 19, 2008 17:04:14 GMT -4
internet performance league now were talking i would have alittle more control of the inflation spread in this league and can rebound from a devestating injury
|
|
|
|
Post by uhlans on Mar 20, 2008 7:05:05 GMT -4
Come on now guys wouldn't you like to see War Dogs and I on the same committee? Think how nice it might be if you didn't have to hear the War dogs and/or my input while serving on the committee. No Uhlans No War Dogs .......... anyone smiling yet? |
|
|
|
Post by tigers on Mar 20, 2008 20:05:51 GMT -4
After hundreds of venomous posts, all that is left is humor.
|
|
|
|
Post by uhlans on Mar 21, 2008 16:42:22 GMT -4
After hundreds of venomous posts, all that is left is humor. Not yet - The War Dogs make my case as to why a revolving committee might be the best way to keep us from eating ourselves over how to conduct a year-end party. |
|
|
|
Post by tigers on Mar 24, 2008 8:34:09 GMT -4
While some, including myself, are willing to trust others, most are not. A committee with the power to decide is not gonna fly.
I'm now concentrating how to make it work otherwise in a manner that its creation passes. I believe the league can vote on a choice of plans.
|
|
|
|
Post by uhlans on Mar 24, 2008 17:25:46 GMT -4
While some, including myself, are willing to trust others, most are not. A committee with the power to decide is not gonna fly. I'm now concentrating how to make it work otherwise in a manner that its creation passes. I believe the league can vote on a choice of plans. How are you so sure that a commitee with power will not fly? Tell me what you know. If its truely dead tell me how, who and why I'll verify and then move on. I'm a big boy I'll be fine. You got names give them up - |
|
|
|
Post by tigers on Mar 29, 2008 22:41:50 GMT -4
If the committee's work is NOT binding, why should anyone oppose their very efforts at even trying?
|
|
) finally seen the error in his ways and relented. 