|
Post by wardogs on Mar 6, 2008 12:24:34 GMT -4
this is over kill the only reason we had a problem last year is because it was not decided before the last meeting. when we met at mikes before the party everything was decided within 5 minutes. a simple rule that says we must have decided on a plan before the last in year meeting would resolve all the problems........having said that i am not against a commitee that would do the leg work and make recommendations to the league for a league vote.
|
|
|
Post by uhlans on Mar 8, 2008 20:14:15 GMT -4
........having said that i am not against a commitee that would do the leg work and make recommendations to the league for a league vote. How is that different from what has been happening?
|
|
|
Post by uhlans on Mar 10, 2008 13:31:40 GMT -4
........having said that i am not against a commitee that would do the leg work and make recommendations to the league for a league vote. How is that different from what has been happening? Exactly .... its not working lets try something else
|
|
|
Post by tigers on Mar 10, 2008 16:47:54 GMT -4
Initally, I wanted the committee to provide a couple plans for a league vote. But since I believe it may well lead to an argument, I'm strongly leaning for the committee having complete authority to decide. I'm almost there.
|
|
|
Post by wardogs on Mar 11, 2008 9:01:54 GMT -4
Initially, I wanted the committee to provide a couple plans for a league vote. But since I believe it may well lead to an argument, I'm strongly leaning for the committee having complete authority to decide. I'm almost there. WHO HAVE YOU BEEN TALKING TO..DID YOU NOT JUST SAY IN ANOTHER THREAD THAT THE MAJORITY SHOULD ALWAYS RULE AND NOW YOU WANT TO LET 3 DECIDE FOR 8 JUST TO AVOID ARGUMENTS. THIS IS A BAD IDEA. SO NOW I GUESS I AM A ROADBLOCKING OBSTRUCTIONIST. I BELIEVE I HAVE VOTED YES ON 98% OF OUR RULE BOOK. CHECK THE RECORD. WHAT I WILL NOT DO IS ROLL OVER AND LET REALLY BAD IDEAS LIKE THIS BECOME RULES...SEEMS LIKE A COMMUNISTIC IDEA TO ME. WHO DECIDED WHO IS ON THE COMMITTEE THE ALMIGHTY kiser....WHAT IF MORE THAN 3 WANT ON THE COMMITTEE... WILL SOME BE BLOCKED BECAUSE OF THEIR VIEWS. SOUNDS LIKE A FASCIST STATE TO ME.
|
|
|
Post by uhlans on Mar 11, 2008 11:27:39 GMT -4
Dear Roadblocking Obstructionist ;D You ask a good question. Who decides who is on the committee? Why the fascist league of course. ;D Kidding aside I’d say look for volunteers. If more than 3 would like this honor than we can have them give us their “Vote for me speech” and vote we shall do. It sounds to me that at the very least you should be on the committee this year. Look if current members on the committee don’t do a good job or you feel they didn’t represent you then by all means put your name in the hat and be on the committee the next year and show them how it should be done. You like what members have done pat them on the back and hope they do it again the following year. - Almighty Kaiser.
|
|
|
Post by rebels on Mar 11, 2008 12:34:06 GMT -4
Let's remember that the purpose of the committee approach is simply to deal with situations such as the league party in a less chaotic way. I would never vote for anything that would exclude anyone's opinions, suggestions, or ideas, but history shows us that eight people with eight different ideas in the same room arguing, is probably not the best way of handling things. I, personally, do not want to be on this particular committee, but I am satisfied with the knowledge that I can relay any suggestion I might have to the committee, and that it will be taken into consideration. I also believe that any three of the eight of us will take everyone's best interest to heart. The bottom line is that once they have all the information they need, they can calmly discuss the options and report back to the league. Maybe this will allow me to cut back on my medication.
|
|
|
Post by wardogs on Mar 11, 2008 13:10:23 GMT -4
Let's remember that the purpose of the committee approach is simply to deal with situations such as the league party in a less chaotic way. I would never vote for anything that would exclude anyone's opinions, suggestions, or ideas, but history shows us that eight people with eight different ideas in the same room arguing, is probably not the best way of handling things. I, personally, do not want to be on this particular committee, but I am satisfied with the knowledge that I can relay any suggestion I might have to the committee, and that it will be taken into consideration. I also believe that any three of the eight of us will take everyone's best interest to heart. The bottom line is that once they have all the information they need, they can calmly discuss the options and report back to the league. Maybe this will allow me to cut back on my medication. When the Rebels say discuss options and report back to the league, I can deal with this, but if you are talking about 2 or 3 members mandating things for the rest.....never, never, never, and once again this is a huge over reaction. Last year was the only time we had an issue and that was because it was not decided by the last meeting. If we correct that problem then this will be a NON ISSUE. I DO NOT WANT TO LIVE IN A COMMUNISTIC STATE.
|
|
|
Post by bulls on Mar 11, 2008 15:36:01 GMT -4
I WILL BE ON A YEAREND PARTY COMMTTEE. I NEED SOME MORE HELP. PUT YOUR NAME ON THE LIST. BULLS.
|
|
|
Post by wardogs on Mar 11, 2008 15:46:24 GMT -4
PUT ME ON THE LIST ALSO
|
|
|
Post by wardogs on Mar 11, 2008 15:54:44 GMT -4
How is that different from what has been happening? Exactly .... its not working lets try something else SAYS WHO THAT ITS NOT WORKING OTHER THAN LAST YEAR THIS HAS NEVER BEEN A PROBLEM, AND ONCE AGAIN THE ONLY REASON AND I REPEAT ONLY REASON IT WAS A PROBLEM LAST YEAR IS BECAUSE IT WAS NOT DECIDED BEFORE THE LAST IN YEAR MEETING. TO SAY ITS NOT WORKING REMINDS ME OF THE GEORGE BUSH STYLE OF GOVERNMENT.....IF YOU REPEAT A LIE ENOUGH TIMES IT BECOMES TRUE
|
|
|
Post by uhlans on Mar 12, 2008 14:38:59 GMT -4
Now I'm not sure what to believe......... Am I fascist, a communist, a Bush sympathizer, or the town crier ? Thankfully I'm not a " sore loser" - someone who loses in a fair discussion who simply can't be honorable, by accepting defeat. On the contrary, said individual engages in childish pissing and moaning; whining about it on a constant basis. I actually like your rule idea about serving only 1 year as commish. We agree to disagree on this issue, yes?
|
|
|
Post by uhlans on Mar 12, 2008 14:46:56 GMT -4
Ribbing aside I've about said all I have to say regrading the Committee issue. I'm not going to change anyones mind.
If indeed you are undecided then I'd be happy to take calls regarding this issue if you have any questions or comments.
Consider is all I ask
Thank You
Kaiser
|
|
|
Post by wardogs on Mar 12, 2008 16:45:01 GMT -4
Now I'm not sure what to believe......... Am I fascist, a communist, a Bush sympathizer, or the town crier ? Thankfully I'm not a " sore loser" - someone who loses in a fair discussion who simply can't be honorable, by accepting defeat. On the contrary, said individual engages in childish pissing and moaning; whining about it on a constant basis. I actually like your rule idea about serving only 1 year as commish. We agree to disagree on this issue, yes? I wouldn't count your chickens....nothing has been passed yet
|
|
|
Post by wardogs on Mar 12, 2008 16:52:21 GMT -4
Ribbing aside I've about said all I have to say regrading the Committee issue. I'm not going to change anyones mind. If indeed you are undecided then I'd be happy to take calls regarding this issue if you have any questions or comments. Consider is all I ask Thank You Kaiser I can have an open mind about a committee I just want to know who will have the final say. If 3 are to dictate to 8 my guess is that you will have a hard time finding 5 votes for that...just a guess
|
|